The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But what we see with the psychedelic medicines is something that's incredibly different, right? That people are having experiences that are so delinked from our normal experience of reality. And then when they come in a sense back online with right, in a normal cognitive way, they realize like, wow, now I'm applying all those mechanisms of trying to understand truth and to that, and what I see is that it's true and wow, it's true.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And then when they come in a sense back online with with in a normal cognitive way they realize like wow now I'm applying all those mechanisms of trying to understand truth and to to that and what what I see is that it's true and wow it's true like I mean we hear that all the time which tells me hey something different is going on there