Andrew Huberman· PhD
So I consider the science and use of psilocybin to be an exciting, but still preliminary area that I certainly am paying a lot of attention to.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I consider the science and use of psilocybin to be an exciting, but still preliminary area that I certainly am paying a lot of attention to.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think psilocybin is an exciting and super interesting compound for basic and clinical reasons and for other reasons as well. But they are sharp blades as we say. And with sharp blades, you can do incredible things, but you can also cut yourself very badly.