Andrew Huberman· PhD
"Micro-dosing has shown very little effect compared to macro-dosing, which has been successful in trials for the treatment of depression."
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
"Micro-dosing has shown very little effect compared to macro-dosing, which has been successful in trials for the treatment of depression."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the micro doing of psilocybin has not been shown to be Terri effective which is not to say it isn't but the trials don't support that although there aren't many Trials of that yet so it appears you know if you had to pick between micro and macro dosing go macro