Andrew Huberman· PhD
Microdosing is just appealing, but again, science isn't about what we want to believe, it's about what's actually coming through and what seems to hold up to testing.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Microdosing is just appealing, but again, science isn't about what we want to believe, it's about what's actually coming through and what seems to hold up to testing.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
By the way, there's not a lot of evidence that microdosing is useful. I'm not saying it's not, but there not a lot of clinical trials showing that.