We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Um I worry about micro doing you know I think people are taking um these things like coffee and it's not coffee you know. [...] And we've we've suddenly unleashed the use of it. Tens of millions of people are using it. Not in the way that Michael Pollen describes of like putting it into a cultural container of inquiry and knowledge and guidance uh and someone who knows what they're doing around you. And so >> safety even >> safety. Yeah. So we're seeing that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.