We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Uh I had a very significant failure in a clinical trial because we took a whole group of patients um who had macular degeneration. We treated them with red light and we treated their part more women have macular degeneration than men. We took their husbands as the control subjects. Um, and to a first approximation we got absolutely no effect whatsoever.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.