The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
when they did the RIS veratrol experiment and they did it in combination with the people who found the result of that study so they consulted these people and said what dose should we give and they said do this do this do this and they did it and nothing there was no effective RIS veratrol
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the ITP s they just showed what we already published which is that if you give her a troll in regular food it doesn't extend lifespan
we tested it um because um the director of the national aging Institute Richard hotus for the first and last time said you will test Resveratrol or you will not get anybody this year we said yes sir yes sir so we we tested it we used we checked with David Sinclair and asked David what is the concentration we ought to use he said use this concentration and this concentration we said sure we'll do it your way let's find out and it didn't work