The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these foods did not exist you know 100 years ago a lot of them like these things are manipulate the plates we were eating today did not give estimate did not exist we're not eating throughout most of human evolution like the three biggest sources of calories which is you know wheat corn and rice like these things were not eaten at all throughout human evolution
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.