The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you're doing this blood flow restriction training that's probably going to increase the N a.m. PT so this enzyme that's making nad so I guess then the the hypothesis or the postulate becomes could this blood flow restriction training help people with sarcopenia or help people who can't make enough nad don't have enough muscle mass make more of this because their muscles early
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.