The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Sarcopenia is the loss of muscle mass and strength. It's a constant phenomenon in aging. Well, not really. It's only a constant phenomenon in aging when you're not eating enough animal foods like your biology is clearly telling you to.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
avoidance of meat because as We Know avoiding meat is going to make it very hard to not become sarcopenic as you age and that is what makes you die