We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if you look at low muscle mass versus high muscle mass, what is the improvement? And it's pretty significant. It's about three X. So if you compare low muscle mass people to high muscle mass people as they age, the low muscle mass people have about a three X hazard ratio, or 200% increase in all-cause mortality.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a whole discussion the whole idea that like too much muscle mass is detrimental to your health at ages is like a giant misnomer
which is a precursor to like the the whole uh you know curve j-shaped thing of of too much muscle mass getting large as you age is higher mortality it's like you're looking at bigger people yeah this what you're really looking at
there's a whole discussion the whole idea that like too much muscle mass is detrimental to your health and age is like a giant misnomer