The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we came up of a study that was done in the 60s that showed that this was epidemiology and has its limitations that people that have their older people that still have their own teeth generally also have their muscle still intact
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we came up of a study that was done in the 60s that showed that this was epidemiology and has its limitation that people that have their older people that still have their own teeth generally also have their muscle still intact