Peter Attia· MD
more recently another study came out trying hot bath effect it had a positive effect on a variety of cardiovascular related markers as well
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
more recently another study came out trying hot bath effect it had a positive effect on a variety of cardiovascular related markers as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
which again if but you have to sit in it long enough you know to experience some of those effects or the elevation of the heart rate and all that stuff
and just as exercise is known to help with cardiovascular disease I think sauna has a number of those benefits as well
A recent study found hot baths more effective than three 10-minute sessions in a 176°F sauna or 45 minutes in a far-infrared sauna.
But the study is good proof-of-concept that, if you can't access a sauna, a hot tub or bath can have similar benefits for cardiovascular health.
4–7 sauna sessions per week, 20 minutes at 80°C+, reduce cardiovascular mortality risk by 40% over a decade.
Regular sauna use raises BDNF and improves verbal memory in older adults.
Sauna protocols only generate the longevity effect when sessions exceed 30 minutes.
Hot-tub bathing yields cardiovascular benefits comparable to traditional Finnish sauna at matched core-temp dose.