The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you start looking at populations that don't look at seed oils like the catawbans the samani down in uh latin america or the eskimos prior to the introduction of western foods where you go through weston price's work what you realize is that the people who don't eat seed oils don't ever have any of these problems that we're going to talk about today
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
looking at cultures like the catawbas the tava ruins the tukacinta the kaiwi meno the uh the simone uh the nigerian yaruba that there's so many of these populations the hadza these people don't have the same incidence of cardiovascular disease that we do and they yet they eat tons of saturated fat many of them eat carbohydrates but what do they do differently than humans in the westernized countries they don't eat seed oils