The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and by the way type-2 diabetes did not it wasn't described before 1938 so I mean maybe it didn't exist maybe we didn't know how to look for it but I think it didn't exist that's where I'm drawing the line in the sand it doesn't really exist in indigenous cultures right it doesn't exist something it's essentially unheard of in indigenous peoples and so it probably didn't exist before 1938 till we started having the technology to make oils from vegetables
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.