The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there is a threshold right and if you look at hunter-gatherer tribes across the world it seems to be about two to three percent of their calories are from linoleic acid and this includes occasional probably nuts and seeds and then there's a little bit of linoleic acid and animal fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
indigenous hunter-gatherer type populations generally don't consume I shouldn't even say generally consistently invariably do not consume more than two to three percent of their calories from seed oils
the American population is seven to ten percent of our calories from seed oils now two to three percent versus seven to ten percent may not sound like enough but it's or a lot but it's really important to understand that perhaps the the actual effect of those oils is seen between that range
hunter-gatherers only really have two to three percent of their calories in linoleic acid we've never done this this is a horrible human experiment
historically humans would have had probably less than two% of their calories from linolic acid and we would have we would have had very low single digits