The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and we know that more of this linoleic acid which is present in huge amounts in seed oils equals more hne in the human body and more of these endogenous cannabinoids which is the real part in satiety but we know that hne can sabotage satiety and these endogenous cannabinoids which I'll talk about in a moment can also sabotage Society
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they are high in a polyunsaturated omega-6 fatty acid called linoleic acid which appears to have problems at many levels for humans problems in terms of satiety by activating cannabinoid receptors in the human body making us hungry problems the level of the brain problems at the level of our cell membranes problems at the level of mitochondria
when you give linolic acid to animals you see two cannabinoids you see anandamide and 2 a increase in the brains of those animals and that leads to hunger okay because those canabo uh are going to bind to the CB1 the cannaboid one receptor in the brain and that makes us hungry