The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
i have to hypothesize that a lot of skin cancer risk whether it's squamous basal or melanoma which is not an entirely sun-related cancer are potentially worsened exacerbated by seed oils excess seed oil consumption in our skin
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
from this we may derive another possibility which is if we eat in an evolutionarily consistent manner as humans maybe we can be in the sun and not get burned and not develop skin cancers like so many of those who are metabolically unhealthy eating a standard american diet overly rich in linoleic acid may suffer
is it possible that increased linoleic acid consumption could be causing fragility
I happen to believe that sunburn, squam cell, basilc cell cancer, these are mostly related to the amount of linoleic acid in the cell membranes of your dermis and epidermis. And those are related to how many seed oils you're eating primarily.