The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so visceral fat was reduced by 70 percent in the stearic acid fed group compared to the other diets uh the lean body mass was increased in the stearic acid fed group compared to all other groups by dexa and they compared stearic acid to oleic acid and linoleic acid
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the safflower oil increased visceral adipose tissue so i cannot say that we are convinced that monounsaturated fat is great for the visceral adipose tissue either there's not a lot of monounsaturated fat in our diets although there's a whole lot more of that than linoleic and i think that if you're eating ruminants you're getting monounsaturated fat so it's probably not a big deal i think the main signal here is linoleic acid and the combination of linoleic acid and oleic acid in safflower oil or the fact that safflower oil still has way too much linoleic acid is what's causing this visceral adipose tissue to grow
when you give it linoleic acid they get really fat in the viscera
the visceral fat was reduced by seventy percent in the stearic acid fed group compared to the other diets seventy percent seven zero percent
the lean body mass was increased in