We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if you look at the list of excluded studies from this meta-analysis conveniently Darius mazafarian and his group have excluded randomized controlled trials from the 60s and 70s specifically the Minnesota coronary trial and the city diet heart trial which showed worsening rates of coronary artery disease coronary events and death when you had more seed oils in the diet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.