The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There's conditions like ompic butt or ompic bod like I was referring to in my tweet on X that I mentioned earlier. And this is essentially sarcopenia. It's loss of so much muscle mass that yeah, you lose weight but you don't have a butt which is not attractive on men or women and you become very frail.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.