Andrew Huberman· PhD
You know, and if you're batting an 80%, you know, sleep efficiency average, we're a bit concerned about that. But add 10% to that and now you're in, you know, a great echelon of healthy sleepers
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
You know, and if you're batting an 80%, you know, sleep efficiency average, we're a bit concerned about that. But add 10% to that and now you're in, you know, a great echelon of healthy sleepers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So to be clear, if you're hitting 95% uh you're not giving yourself enough time in bed is almost assuredly the case. And if you're, you know, hitting 75%, you're probably spending too much time in bed.
Sleep efficiency is time sleeping divided by time in bed. You want to be able to hit at least 85% here.