The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
today while there were probably nine statins out there there were really only four that we even use and at least two of them have such a low side effect profile they're not as potent but they have a I mean potent a bit of the potent the wrong word they don't have the same effect um but they're very potent because you're at least one of them you're taking at such a low dose um that we've got lots of Statin options
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I believe that different statins work differently in different people I think there's a gender difference I think when in doubt low dose is better
it's also so highly individualized that I think you just have to try a couple until you find the ones that are doing them doing the best without any collateral damage