We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
The reviews were dogmatic according to Maran deasi editorial uh about advocating wider use of statins in healthy people primary prevention which we already talked about in this podcast at least according to the 4S study um not a lot of good data there and accompanying out tal argued that everyone over 50 should be taking a Statin regardless of their cholesterol levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Professor Rory Collins this group of researchers began periodically publishing their own reviews of Statin data from clinical trials the reviews were dogmatic according to Marion damasi's editorial about advocating wider use of statins and healthy people primary prevention