Paul Saladino· MD
you could give them a stat and I think that's reasonably indicated in Western medicine especially if they're not going to change their diet but let's also correct the root cause of their diabetes in the first place
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you could give them a stat and I think that's reasonably indicated in Western medicine especially if they're not going to change their diet but let's also correct the root cause of their diabetes in the first place
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and of course if you have damaged endothelium if you have a diabetic individual could higher ldl be worse absolutely absolutely should we try and lower the ldl in that individual who has diabetes and we know has damage endothelium which is not healing properly i would say that's reasonable but let's also correct the root cause of their diabetes in the first place
should we try and lower the ldl in that individual who has diabetes and we know has damage endothelium which is not healing properly i would say that's reasonable but let's also correct the root cause of their diabetes in the first place