Bryan Johnson· Author
(In humans, statins are associated with a modest increase in diabetes risk overall; this is not reliably diagnosed by “LDL too low,” and risk is most evident in predisposed individuals).
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
(In humans, statins are associated with a modest increase in diabetes risk overall; this is not reliably diagnosed by “LDL too low,” and risk is most evident in predisposed individuals).
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well there's some that are well known I mean the diabetes risk and I've seen up to three hundred and sixty-three percent relative increasing risk with diabetes diabetes may not come that's quite a significant absolute risk as well like three two or three percent increase in risk
associated with an increased risk of diabet I abetes this may be a medication class effect
if you look in some of the studies the risk for diabetes and cancer in some of the studies that we talk about here that we site is pretty is like relatively uh decent risk