We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
then you have at best, right? This is still industry-sponsored data that's non-transparent, right? But at best, you have a 1% chance, a one in 100 chance that if you take that pill religiously for 5 years, it's going to prevent you having a non-fatal heart attack or stroke if you do not get side effects. But will not prolong your life.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
then you have at best right this is still industry sponsored data that's non-transparent right but at best you have a one percent chance a one in a hundred chance that if you take that pill religiously for five years it's going to prevent you having a non-fatal heart attack stroke if you do not get side effects but will not prolong your life