The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Statin seem to work for a lot of different people and some have thought that for instance rather than using that as a medication would there be a way of genetically making a manipulation so it's kind of a one time and not having to require continued ongoing therapy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
statins as an example in terms of treatment for hypercholesterolemia there may be various different genetic mechanisms by which one has an increased risk for a heart attack yet statins seem to work for a lot of different people and some have thought that for instance rather than using that as a medication would there be a way of genetically making a manipulation so it's kind of a one time and not having to require continued ongoing therapy