We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Another study that followed red meat consumption in 216,695 participants found that participants in the top 20% of total red meat consumption had 61% higher risk of developing type-2-diabetes compared to their pears in the bottom 20%, the risk increase was 51% and 40% for processed and unprocessed meat.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
A study on a cohort of 116.653 US adults found a 12% and 32% increase in type-2-diabetes risk for 1 daily serving of unprocessed and processed red meat, respectively.