Paul Saladino· MD
Why do “anti-inflammatory” diets exclude red meat when there’s not a shred of evidence this is inflammatory?
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Why do “anti-inflammatory” diets exclude red meat when there’s not a shred of evidence this is inflammatory?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and why would it be right what's the evolutionary context why would red meat be inflammatory oh yeah you and I are gonna go hunt Amole mammoths and it's gonna prevent us from being healthy beings to pass on our genes that gene is gonna get called out 4 million years ago right like there's it doesn't make any sense