Paul Saladino· MD
there's really no good evidence that meat is going to negatively affect your longevity
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there's really no good evidence that meat is going to negatively affect your longevity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Meat vs. Plants for longevity. And the argument I made in that podcast was that sarcopenia kills far, far more people. I don't believe red meat kills anyone, but I think sarcopenia is way worse for longevity than anyone can make an argument that red meat is bad for longevity. I don't think red meat is bad for longevity at all
I don't believe red meat kills anyone but I think sarcopenia is way worse for longevity than anyone can make an argument that red meat is bad for longevity I don't think about meat is bad for longevity at all
there's really no good evidence that meat is going to negatively affect your longevity
red meat is a longevity food
so if you want to improve your longevity eat more of this eat more red meat