Paul Saladino· MD
if you are on a beef diet you are getting the double whammy of good things you are not eating omega-6 and you are getting the best thing that we know of to mop up any residual damage from h e
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you are on a beef diet you are getting the double whammy of good things you are not eating omega-6 and you are getting the best thing that we know of to mop up any residual damage from h e
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
doing something like eating a lot of beef where you're going to be getting a lot of carnosine is probably a beneficial way to deal with that linoleic stored linoleic acid that is going to be released over the next couple of years regardless of what you do
it seems to be you know meat has this wonderful property of a not having much omega-6 well beef at least not having a much omega-6 fatty acids and also having this thing called carnosine so carnosine is the most effective antioxidant known against hne