We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if you really dig into this you find that the concentrations are orders of magnitude over what might be formed in the gut again this is the problem with much of this research they are using inconsistent in vitro evidence that is using orders of magnitude higher levels of dna adducts many of which are actually repaired in the gut by k ras and other genes as they talk about in this paper
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.