Paul Saladino· MD
And they eat all those things together, and then the red meat gets blamed for their bad outcomes. I would posit, I would suggest strongly, red meat has nothing to do with that. Again, that is a case of unhealthy user bias.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And they eat all those things together, and then the red meat gets blamed for their bad outcomes. I would posit, I would suggest strongly, red meat has nothing to do with that. Again, that is a case of unhealthy user bias.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
don't blame red meat for the things that grains that are irritating for your gut seed oils high fructose corn syrup listen to last week's podcast about the differences between that and sugar or sucrose those are what are causing the problems not red meat