Paul Saladino· MD
the chicken is not what's good for them the not eating red meat is also not benefiting them because we see no uh negative effects from eating red meat in the population but this is a clear behavioral effect associated with this
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the chicken is not what's good for them the not eating red meat is also not benefiting them because we see no uh negative effects from eating red meat in the population but this is a clear behavioral effect associated with this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.