Paul Saladino· MD
their odds I mean you look literally looking at a thirty four thirty to forty percent chance and perhaps even higher yeah
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
their odds I mean you look literally looking at a thirty four thirty to forty percent chance and perhaps even higher yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you must consume increasing amounts of protein and you must do strength training to ward off sarcopenia as you age
we know full well that two things have to be true to avoid sarcopenia adequate protein intake which as you age gets bigger and bigger that number goes up and up and up due to anabolic resistance coupled with strength training
Sarcopenia which is the condition of uh muscle loss and that's that's a huge problem and there's really two ways to um in concert two ways to address that. One is consuming enough protein and the other is doing enough resistance training.
but there's another condition of aging called sarcopenia which is the condition of uh muscle loss and that's that's a huge problem and there's really two ways to um in concert two ways to address that. One is consuming enough protein and the other is doing enough resistance training.