The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so I actually prefer doing something more like 3 days a week of total body and if something happens you've just missed that body part for 48s hours 72 hours I like that a little better for most people not because it's more effective but just because it it's a little bit more resilient to life and you can get there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It would be awesome if people would look at their schedule, I think, and say, you know, how many days a week can I go to the gym and really put real work into it, progressive overload, focus training, all these things. How much time can I really dedicate to that? And then backineer the ideal split and way to work out from there.
I would still do is keep the same structure total body on all three days because here's what's also going to happen once a month you're going to miss one of those days for more your kid's G to get sick I got too busy at work blah blah blah blah blah if you do body part splits you start missing all day you're going to miss chunks so I like in these situations these people I want whole body every day
if you do body part splits you start missing all day you're going to miss chunks so I like in these situations these people I want whole body every day you're going to recover just fine