The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you're going to use higher repetitions, let's say between eight and 15, which for me seems like high repetitions, um you can I don't want to say get away with, but you could do two or three sets per muscle group um or per exercise and maybe two exercises for a muscle group. Whereas, if you were going to train in the three to six rep range, you might need to do eight sets of
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, if we're doing sets of three, we're going to need to do a lot of sets of three to accomplish the same overall volume that we would get by doing sets of eight or 10.
one of the nice things about the 6 to 15 reps is you can accumulate quite a bit of metabolic fatigue you can use relatively heavy loads and you can get quite a bit of volume in that rep range