Andrew Huberman· PhD
on the field you're not doing 30 reps you're doing one rep and then it'll be later you're going to do another rep so uh your conditioning for a fast fibers can be structured in the same manner
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
on the field you're not doing 30 reps you're doing one rep and then it'll be later you're going to do another rep so uh your conditioning for a fast fibers can be structured in the same manner
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, if you take a weight that you could do um maximum eight, like you'd fail somewhere between seven and eight repetitions, you take the the weight, maybe even add a little bit, and you just do three repetitions, you don't go to failure, but you do many more sets.
take a a weight that you can maybe do six or seven, maybe eight reps with and do three repetitions, set it down and just do many more sets of rest a long period of time if you have time to do that. That really like that really work those fast twitch motor units.