Peter Attia· MD
you don't know what two reps in reserve means until you go to failure you have to fail many times to actually know how bad two reps in reserve is
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
you don't know what two reps in reserve means until you go to failure you have to fail many times to actually know how bad two reps in reserve is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you're looking to stop a few reps short of failure, it requires you to be able to accurately gauge your true limits - something hard to do, if you've never trained to failure in the first place.
practically I think most people probably should train to failure at a certain point because otherwise it's really hard to determine what failure is
one of the cool great recommendations I think from Lane Norton was that everybody trained a failure at least once and you know maybe every training block trained a failure at least once Because unless you train to failure similar to like what we talked about with V2 max if you never go to failure you don't really know what failure feels like