The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
when you look at cortical thickness of the total hip uh sorry total femoral neck there was a 133% net benefit uh in the intervention group and if you looked specifically at the lateral femoral neck cortex there was a 27% Improvement
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we had something like A6 uh perc Improvement at the femoral neck and I'm thinking these women deadlifting and squatting 70 kilos how can that be
when you look at cortical thickness of the total hip uh sorry total femoral neck there was a 133% net benefit uh in the intervention group and if you looked specifically at the lateral femoral neck cortex there was a 27% Improvement
we ended up with a net benefit of a bit over 4% at the spine that that equated to about 3% Improvement at the spine in bmd and about one and a half or one and a bit loss in controls