Andrew Huberman· PhD
Do some, like a very classic warm up thing would be like a set of 10 at 50%. A set of eight at 60%. A set of maybe eight again at 70%. And then maybe like a set of five at 75%.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Do some, like a very classic warm up thing would be like a set of 10 at 50%. A set of eight at 60%. A set of maybe eight again at 70%. And then maybe like a set of five at 75%.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
A very classic warm-up thing would be like a set of 10 at 50%, a set of eight at 60%, a set of maybe eight again at 70%, and then maybe like a set of five at 75%.