Peter Attia· MD
so the time that it would take me varied from maybe 90 minutes in like the early part of that uh build phase um all the way up to two two and a half hours daily and I was doing five sessions a week at that point
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the time that it would take me varied from maybe 90 minutes in like the early part of that uh build phase um all the way up to two two and a half hours daily and I was doing five sessions a week at that point
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you know progressively overloading like my first week of a a Mis cycle might have been three working sets of everything on my list and I might have had six or seven exercises by the sixth week of training I would be pushing like five working hard sets High training intensity you know rpes eight and nines of like my first three exercises and then four of everything else like the volume I was getting up to was insane