Andrew Huberman· PhD
So by definition, true strength training is really going to be in the like five repetitions per set or less range.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So by definition, true strength training is really going to be in the like five repetitions per set or less range.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, by definition, true strength training is really going to be in like five repetitions per set or less range.
the strength Matrix or that's the that's the strength column here is regardless of which of those athletes you are when you want to focus on your strength part of what you do which every one of those athletes has to be strong including the Sprinter you've got to be in the three to five that
they're not going to optimize their strength doing 12 reps they're going to have to be in sub five