Peter Attia· MD
and a third is muscle mass but I think when you look at the data you realize muscle mass is so coupled to strength that that Association is tight
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and a third is muscle mass but I think when you look at the data you realize muscle mass is so coupled to strength that that Association is tight
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
muscle mass and strength are not equivalent uh and when put head-to-head strength beats muscle mass as a predictor of lifespan
so muscle mass and strength are not equivalent and when put Head to Head strength beats muscle mass as a predictor of lifespan
and strength and then a third is muscle mass but I think when you look at the data you realize muscle mass is so coupled to strength that that Association is tight
Muscle strength may be an even more important predictor of general health and longevity than muscle mass.
The more muscle mass you have and more muscle strength is associated with lower all-cause mortality, so that would be interesting to see if that's also related.