Andrew Huberman· PhD
People used to think, well, you'll probably start losing muscle mass in your 30s. No, it's probably more like in your 50s you can maintain all of it.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
People used to think, well, you'll probably start losing muscle mass in your 30s. No, it's probably more like in your 50s you can maintain all of it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
finally it's very important when people are still able to put on muscle that they put on as much as possible because once you're in the over 50 category you're kind of clawing on for dear life and trying to keep as much of that muscle as possible so I don't really want people entering middle AG with a muscle deficit
first of all he was he mentioned that your Peak muscle mass occurs between the age of 20 and 30 for me was quite while ago I mean you're you're reaching that point but that's that's your Peak and then after that Peak about you start to decline