Andrew Huberman· PhD
Mike gave me my first real program to follow in 1991. I’ve modified it a bit over the years to include a bit more volume not as much training to failure or past, but it has served me extremely well.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Mike gave me my first real program to follow in 1991. I’ve modified it a bit over the years to include a bit more volume not as much training to failure or past, but it has served me extremely well.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I've tended to train to failure purposefully and used to do Force reps and drop sets and all that stuff as the years have gone by I've started only incorporating a few sets to failure and my volume has increased somewhat and I'm training heavier at lower repetitions and my progress as I get you know toward my fifth decade just continues to um just continues