Andrew Huberman· PhD
I would rather have someone really ease in and sort of get used to it because a lot of people will say, "Yeah, I went a little too heavy and it really sucked." Like, I want you to sort of on ramp slowly.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I would rather have someone really ease in and sort of get used to it because a lot of people will say, "Yeah, I went a little too heavy and it really sucked." Like, I want you to sort of on ramp slowly.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, I generally tell people if you just want like a firm number, don't go over 50 pounds. Um, if you want a more sort of dialedin number to your body weight, don't go over a third of your body weight.
So, if you're in a within a reasonable amount of weight and not too heavy, um, the injury rate is exceedingly low. It's not that much higher than the injury rate of walking and walking is pretty safe.
I think it's also a good tool for runners because the injury rate is much lower. So if you're within a reasonable amount of weight like of course if you go up to these crazy weights.