Peter Attia· MD
the the issue is is that you have a tremendously wide range and it's not reliable meaning that on day one you might say 7 out of 10 is is 90 aop the next day it might be 10 so we don't really recommend that scale anymore
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the the issue is is that you have a tremendously wide range and it's not reliable meaning that on day one you might say 7 out of 10 is is 90 aop the next day it might be 10 so we don't really recommend that scale anymore
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.