The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
There's no reason to change your training because we still want the same adaptations. We want to increase and maintain muscle size and strength. We want to reduce fall risk and fracture risk, maintain bone density. And so resistance training is going to be a really key component of an exercise program for somebody uh pre and post menopause.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
When it comes to training in the literature, I haven't seen huge evidence or a variation evidence that good training doesn't incl. There is not something specific for women that needs to happen rather than following good foundational principles of strength training, hypertrophy and cardiovascular activity.
There is not something specific for women that needs to happen rather than following good foundational principles of strength training, hypertrophy and cardiovascular activity.
as we get older and we get uh hormone dis disbalances then people feel differences but the efficacy by which training increases muscle mass and muscle strength and muscle conditioning doesn't seem to have a huge impact there so far I mean this is not my topic with uh with but but most of the studies with pre uh and post wom menopausal women I believe and even with and without uh supplementation we see hardly any studies that I've seen don't show any differences